Primer|National Security   3 Minute Read

Country Brief: Libya

Published May 24, 2016

Updated On September 30, 2016

Jump To

Takeaways

Five years after the 2011 NATO intervention that helped overthrow the regime of Muammar Qadhafi, Libya's recently installed unity government remains unsteady. A civil war has created a security vacuum and safe haven for ISIS and other terrorist groups. A tough and smart approach to Libya requires:

  • Destroying ISIS in Libya; and
  • Strengthening the UN-brokered unity government.

Libya’s ongoing civil war has turned portions of the country into a terrorist safe haven. ISIS has expanded along Libya’s central coast, and is vying for control of key oil infrastructure. Europe lies just across the Mediterranean Sea, and refugees fleeing for Italy provide cover for terrorists seeking passage to the West. According to the top U.S. commander in Africa, groups like ISIS will continue to “flourish until the [government] and appropriate security forces are operational within Libya.”1 Recent U.S. airstrikes and Libyan unity government operations have made significant strides in pushing back ISIS gains, but it will be difficult to rid the country of ISIS and ensure stability until Libya's unity government is able to govern.

Background

Recent history in Libya traces back to 1969, when Libyan strongman Muammar al Qadhafi seized power in a military coup, and began sponsoring terrorist attacks across the globe, including at least two—destroying an airliner over Lockerbie, Scotland, and a nightclub in Berlin—that killed American citizens. In 1992, the United Nations responded with tough economic sanctions on Libya, but those were lifted in 2003 after Qadhafi admitted involvement in the attacks and abandoned his program to obtain nuclear weapons, surrendering his centrifuges.

The 2011 “Arab Spring” spawned a rebellion against Qadhafi’s regime. In March 2011, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1973, which authorized member states “to take all necessary measures” to protect Libyan civilians from regime forces.2 The United States led an air campaign that destroyed Qadhafi’s air defenses and command-and-control infrastructure, helping Libyan rebels overcome pro-regime militias.3

By the end of 2011, rebel militias had killed Qadhafi, and began preparing for a new government. Some foreign nations suggested placing peacekeeping forces in Libya, but the country’s new leaders rejected any foreign presence.4 Six months later, Libyans had elected a new General National Congress (GNC).

Unfortunately, the elections did not restore stability. The GNC decided to pay militias left over from the war, who refused to disband, depriving Libya of a unified military command. Weapons looted from Qadhafi’s arsenal flooded into the black market.5 In September 2012, militants attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, killing a U.S. Ambassador and three other Americans.

Libya has since descended into a chaotic civil war between opposing alliances of nationalist militias and Islamist militias. Without a secure central government, ISIS exploited the chaos to grow a new franchise in Libya. The United Nations brokered a “unity” government in December 2015—the Government of National Accord—to end the conflict, but some militias haven’t endorsed it and an August 2016 vote in parliament refused to approve it.6

A Tough and Smart Approach to Libya

A tough and smart strategy in Libya means maintaining pressure on ISIS with targeted military operations, while working with local allies and European partners to bolster the unity government. The foremost national security threat to the U.S. in Libya is ISIS, which controls thousands of fighters and has gained a foothold near Libya’s oil export facilities.7 An ISIS presence so close to Europe simplifies its task of attacking Western interests. The United States should:

  • Support local anti-ISIS efforts by using special forces to rebuild intelligence capabilities;
  • Arm and share intelligence with vetted Libyan militias who oppose ISIS, but only if they agree to integrate into a centralized security force;
  • Work with European allies, particularly Italy, to continue using airbases close to Libya for airstrikes against ISIS training facilities, like the one that occurred in February 2016;8

In recent months, there have been considerable successes in defeating ISIS in Libya. Earlier this year, the U.S., European Union, and United Nations prevented ISIS from potentially accessing chemical weapons precursors by removing the material from Libya. In addition, with the aid of U.S. airstrikes and special forces, Libyan troops aligned with the Government of National Accord have recently begun pushing back against ISIS in their stronghold of Sirte and have made significant gains. However, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified that political disunity and conflict among militias complicate U.S. efforts to do more in Libya.9 Thus, the United States must complement its military efforts in Libya by:

  • Using its unique authority to convene European allies and Libyan militias of all shapes and sizes;
  • Pressure European and Arab states to limit any foreign aid to only those armed groups who commit to join a centralized, neutral security structure.10
  • Devote sustained, high-level attention to long-term peace negotiations needed to broaden support for the UN-brokered unity government.
  1. Richard Lardner, “U.S. Commander in Africa Says Libya is a Failed State,” Military Times, March 8, 2016. Accessed May 16, 2016. Available at: http://www.militarytimes.com/story/military/capitol-hill/2016/03/08/us-commander-africa-says-libya-failed-state/81486032/.

  2. United Nations, “Resolution 1973 (2011),” United Nations Security Council, March 17, 2011. Accessed May 16, 2016. Available at:  http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2011_03/20110927_110311-UNSCR-1973.pdf.

  3. Jeremiah Gertler, “Operation Odyssey Dawn (Libya): Background and Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service, March 30, 2011. Accessed May 6, 2016. Available at: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R41725.pdf.

  4. “Libya Rejects Idea of International Peacekeepers,” BBC News, August 31, 2011. Accessed May 9, 2016. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-14727034.

  5. United Nations, “Note by the President of the Security Council,” United NAtiosn Security Council, March 9, 2013. Accessed May 10, 2016. Available at: http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/s_2013_99.pdf.

  6. Frederic Wehrey, “The Path Forward in Libya,” Testimony, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, March 3, 2016. Accessed May 18, 2016. Available at: http://carnegieendowment.org/2016/03/03/path-forward-in-libya/iut5.

  7. Jim Sciutto, Barbara Starr and Kevin Liptak, “ISIS Fighters in Libya Surge as Group Suffers Setbacks in Syria, Iraq,” CNN, February 4, 2016. Accessed May 18, 2016. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/02/04/politics/isis-fighters-libya-syria-iraq/.

  8. Greg Botelho and Barbara Starr, “49 Killed in U.S. Airstrike Targeting Terrorists in Libya,” CNN, February 20, 2016. Accessed May 17, 2016. Available at: http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/19/africa/libya-us-airstrike-isis/.

  9. Julian Hattem, “Spy Leaders: Libyan Politics Complicating Anti-ISIS Fight,” The Hill, February 25, 2016. Accessed March 3, 2016. Available at: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/270728-spy-leaders-libyan-politics-complicating-anti-isis-fight.

  10. Frederic Wehrey, “The Path Forward in Libya,” Testimony, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, March 3, 2016. Accessed May 18, 2016. Available at: http://carnegieendowment.org/2016/03/03/path-forward-in-libya/iut5.

FRESH THINKING DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Subscribe to receive email alerts for our products and events and customize your subscription to suit your areas of interest. Your email will never be shared with any third party, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

subscribe »