Graphic|Energy   3 Minute Read

Carbon Capture Projects Map

Published December 7, 2017

Jump To

Carbon Capture Projects

There are 102 carbon capture projects globally, with 53 in the United States. Some are being led by innovative new startups at the early stages of technology development, while others have been in commercial operation for decades. While they all play a role in advancing a carbon capture sector that will be vital to global climate efforts, they’re being used in a number of different ways.

US Carbon Capture Projects

We've developed an interactive map to allow you to dig deeper into the types of projects, filter through their locations, and see who’s working on them. You can also access the database of projects here.

The following is a quick explainer of the major applications for carbon capture technologies.

Power Plants

Power Plants

Carbon capture on power plants that burn coal or natural gas is the most well-known type of project. There are around 13 of these projects globally. In the U.S., coal has been on the decline for years, with a majority of remaining plants expected to retire within a decade. However, significant emissions are still being produced by America’s nearly 2,000 natural gas plants, none of which employ carbon capture. And projections show that the new gas plants expected to come online in the near future will be spewing CO2 for decades. Many of these plants may need to be retrofitted with capture technology to keep the U.S. on a path to reach our CO2 reduction goals. New plants can also be built with carbon capture, like the Petra Nova coal plant and the natural gas plant being developed by NetPower.

BioEnergy with Carbon Capture (or BECCS)

BioEnergy with Carbon Capture (BECCS)

BECCS is one of two ways to achieve negative emissions and the only way to do so while producing power. BECCS facilities generate electricity by burning biomass (plant material) that has absorbed CO2 from the atmosphere throughout its lifetime. Instead of sending that CO2 back into the atmosphere when the biomass is burned, BECCS facilities capture the emissions and either store them or use them for some other purpose. When all's said and done, you end up with more electricity and less atmospheric CO2 than when you started.

Industrial Production

Industrial Production

While industrial sources receive less attention than the power sector, they’re responsible for about 21% of global emissions. And, unlike the power sector, where renewables and other low- or zero-carbon options can help with emissions reductions, carbon capture is the only technology we currently have to significantly decarbonize the industrial sector. Why? Two main reasons. First, very high-temperature heat is needed to create materials like steel or cement, which is achieved through burning fuel. Renewables have very limited abilities to produce high-temperature heat. Second, much of the CO2  produced by these facilities is not from burning fuel, but from the chemical reaction of creating the material. For example, to create cement, limestone is heated to very high temperatures,at which point it breaks down and releases CO2. That’s in addition to the CO2 emitted by burning fuel to create the heat.

Direct Air Capture

Direct Air Capture

Direct air capture is just what it sounds like: sucking CO2 straight from the atmosphere, rather than from a concentrated source like a power plant or steel mill. This technology is less mature than carbon capture on concentrated sources, but today there are already seven direct air projects globally, with 3 in the United States. Direct air capture is another way to get to negative emissions,  something many climate models show we’ll need to keep global warming below 2°C.

Carbon Use

Carbon Use

Instead of thinking of CO2 simply as waste, some look at it as an opportunity to create valuable products. Right now, there are 49 companies working on commercial uses for carbon. These projects turn the captured CO2 into chemicals, building materials, and even shoes. Carbon use is important because, with current commercial technologies, power plants and industrial facilities equipped with carbon capture are more expensive to operate than their counterparts that vent CO2 into the atmosphere. Carbon use can create markets forCO2 emissions, giving carbon capture facilities a new revenue stream that can make them competitive with other power generators.

Additional Resources:

The Global Status of CCS: 2017 from the Global CCS Institute


Subscribe to receive email alerts for our products and events and customize your subscription to suit your areas of interest. Your email will never be shared with any third party, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

subscribe »